|
|
|
|
|
|

MAS Problem Spaces and Their Implications
to Achieving Globally Coherent Behavior
Executive Summary:
|
**Papers to be published in edited collection. Much work in multi-agent systems focuses on coordinating the activities of agents so that the end result approximates the solutions possible if one were to centralize the activities being carried out by the agents. The approach taken to coordination, or even whether coordination is necessary, is often dependent on certain application features. For instance, in supply chain management agents may need to reason about temporal constraints whereas in RoboCup a more reactive coordination approach may be appropriate. In this workshop we will examine the landscape of MAS applications/problem domains and attempt to characterize, classify, and differentiate different problem spaces to understand how problem domains and coordination/control techniques relate. |
|
|
|
Short Presentations:
|
Topic:
|
One goal of multi-agent systems is to solve distributed problems in such a way as to approximate the solutions obtainable if all computation could be centralized. Much research in MAS is on exactly this problem -- how to make it so agents can act locally but achieve coherent global behavior. This class of research takes many forms and includes multi-agent coordination, negotiation, scheduling, planning, agent organization, and problem decomposition to name a few. From this view much of the control problem solving performed by agents in MAS is a form of distributed optimization. Properties of different problem spaces impact the degree to which this kind of distributed optimization is necessary and possible and accordingly the approach taken to coordinating the local decisions of individual agents. For instance, many successful strategies in robotic soccer do not require reasoning about deadlines or planning far downstream temporally -- this is in contrast to a supply chain problem or agent-driven logistics. In essence, the character of the distributed optimization problem and its attributes vary along many dimensions and these differences are driven by applications/problem spaces, different assumptions about problem decomposition, and the types and frequency of interactions between agents. These problems spaces directly impact agent coordination and other MAS technologies. In this workshop we will examine the landscape of MAS applications/problem domains and attempt to characterize, classify, and differentiate different problem spaces. We will also attempt to extract requirements from the domains and understand the implications of different domains to the optimization problems faced by the agents and the coordination technologies/approaches designed to perform the optimization. The long term objective is to move the agent community toward a scientific approach for mapping out a particular application domain and selecting a class of agent control technologies for dealing with the optimization problems present in the domain. Sample domains include but are not limited to: supply chain management, distributed business process coordination, ecommerce, coordination of teams of AUVs, multi-agent information gathering, sensor management, agent-based logistics, etc. Features we will likely examine and explore include: the need for coordination between the agents, the presence of deadlines or temporal constraints, the presence of interactions between agents (e.g., task, resource), required tempo/pace of decision making, level of uncertainty, sequential decision making aspects, the need for temporal synchronization, availability or scarcity of required (shared) resources, grain-size, complexity and scope of individual decision making, the degree to which non-local information is visible or obtainable, the uncertainty of the environment, dynamics, openness, predictability, etc. |
Format:
Participants should submit either a paper for presentation or a research statement. Proposals for panels / discussion groups during the workshop are also welcome. |
Suggested Paper Topics:
|
Dates & Submission Details:
Papers and statements should be submitted electronically in *PDF format* (formatted for US Letter) and sent to Dr. Tom Wagner via Ms. Judy Nyline at nyline_judy@htc.honeywell.com. If electronic submission is not possible, hardcopy should be directed to: Dr. Tom Wagner, 3660 Technology Drive (MN65-2600), Minneapolis, MN 55418. Questions may be directed to wagner_tom@htc.honeywell.com. |
Organizers:
|
Tom Wagner - Honeywell Laboratories,
wagner_tom@htc.honeywell.com
George Vouros - University of the Aegean, georgev@aegean.gr Steven F. Smith - Carnegie Mellon University, sfs@cs.cmu.edu |
Program Committee:
|
Marie desJardins - University of Maryland Baltimore County Suzanne Barber - University of Texas Austin Bernhard Bauer - Siemens Germany Brad Clement - Jet Propulsion Laboratory Keith Decker - University of Delaware Adele Howe - Colorado State University Yanis Labrou - PowerMarket, Inc. Michael Luck - University of Southampton Victor Lesser - University of Massachusetts Amherst Joerg Mueller - Siemens, Germany Martin Purvis - University of Otago Sandip Sen - University of Tulsa Peter Stone - AT&T Labs Katia Sycara - Carnegie Mellon Jose Vidal - University of South Carolina |